www.pediatriepropraxi.cz / Pediatr. praxi. 2023;24(6):389-393 / PEDIATRIE PRO PRAXI 393 PŘEHLEDOVÉ ČLÁNKY Nová metoda měření krevního tlaku v ordinaci lékaře – automatický klinický TK AOBP je u dětí také asociována s HMOD jako v dospělosti. Závěr Automatický TK je novou metodou měření TK v ordinaci lékaře, jejíž velkou předností je vyloučení hypertenze bílého pláště. V současnosti je relativně často využívána v ordinacích praktických lékařů pro dospělé v oblasti Kanady a USA a doporučována evropskou hypertenzní společností. Další předností metody je časová nenáročnost, která ji řadí mezi skríninkové metody, a finanční dostupnost. V dětském věku je nutné dořešit souvislost s HMOD a referenční hodnoty pro AOBP, ale již nyní ji lze ve specializovaných ambulancích využít k porovnání s příležitostnými hodnotami TK. Článek byl podpořen grantem Ministerstva zdravotnictví České republiky (MZČR – 2RVO-FNOs-2023). LITERATURA 1. Šuláková T, Seeman T. Arteriální hypertenze v dětském věku. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita; 2022. 2. Lurbe E, Agabiti-Rosei E, Cruickshank JK, et al. 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Journal of Hypertension [online]. 2016;34(10):1887-1920 [cit. 201902-15]. Available from: doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001039. 3. Stergiou GS, Palatini P, Parati G, et al. 2021 European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for office and out-of- -office blood pressure measurement. Journal of Hypertension [online]. 2021;39(7):1293-1302 [cit. 2023-08-28]. Available from: doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002843. 4. Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics [online]. 2017;140(3) [cit. 2019-02-18]. Available from: doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1904. 5. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/ AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary. Hypertension [online]. 2018;71(6):1269-1324 [cit. 2019-02-18]. Available from: doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066. 6. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Journal of Hypertension [online]. 2018;36(10):1953-2041 [cit. 201905-27]. Available fom: doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940. 7. Lurbe E, Mancia G, Calpe J, et al. Joint statement for assessing and managing high blood pressure in children and adolescents: Chapter 1. How to correctly measure blood pressure in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Pediatrics [online]. 2023;11 [cit. 2023-08-29]. Available from: doi: 10.3389/ fped.2023.1140357. 8. O'brienE, Asmar R, Beilin L, et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. Journal of Hypertension [online]. 2003;21(5):821-848 [cit. 2023-08-28]. Available from: doi: 10.1097/00004872-200305000-00001. 9. Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou, et al. Canadian Journal of Cardiology [online]. 2016;32(5) [cit. 2023-08-28]. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.066. 10. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals. Hypertension [online]. 2005;45(1):142-161 [cit. 2019-04-29]. ISSN 0194-911X. Available from: doi: 10.1161/01. HYP.0000150859.47929.8e. 11. Jegatheswaren J, Ruzicka M, Hiremath S, et al. Are Automated Blood Pressure Monitors Comparable to Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitors? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology [online]. 2017;33(5):644-652 [cit. 2023-08-28]. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.01.020. 12. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood- -Pressure Control. New England Journal of Medicine [online]. 2016;374(23):2290-2295 [cit. 2023-08-28]. Available from: doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1602668. 13. Bo Y, Kwok KO, Chu KKY, et al. Comparison Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements and Manual Office Blood Pressure Measurements – Implications in Individual Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Current Hypertension Reports [online]. 2021;23(1) [cit. 2023-0828]. Available from: 10.1007/s11906-020-01118-1. 14. Moore MN, Schultz MG, Nelson MR, et al. Identification of the Optimal Protocol for Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Among Patients With Treated Hypertension. American Journal of Hypertension [online]. 2018;31(3):299304 [cit. 2023-08-28]. Available from: doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx180. 15. Kaczorowski J, Myers MG, Gelfer M, et al. How do family physicians measure blood pressure in routine clinical practice? National survey of Canadian family physicians. Can Fam Physician. [online]. 2017;63(3):193-199 [cit. 2023-08-28]. 16. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A, et al. Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting. Blood Pressure Monitoring [online]. 2009;14(1):45-47 [cit. 202308-29]. Available from: doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32831e314f. 17. Kronish IM, Edmondson D, Shimbo D, et al. A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Common Office Blood Pressure Measurement Protocols. American Journal of Hypertension [online]. 2018;31(7):827-834 [cit. 2023-08-29]. Available from: doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy053. 18. Seeman T, Staněk K, Slížek J, et al. Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in children. Blood Pressure [online]. 2021;30(6):359-366 [cit. 2023-08-28]. Available from: doi: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1963666. 19. Boonyasai RT, McCannon EL, Landavaso JE. Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care. Current Hypertension Reports [online]. 2019;21(4) [cit. 2023-08-29]. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0936-9.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDA4Mjc=