Pediatr. praxi. 2020;21(2):107-112 | DOI: 10.36290/ped.2020.021

Shaken baby syndrome

MUDr. Erik Nedorost1,2, MUDr. Jakub Pecl1,2, MUDr. Tereza Pinkasová1,2, MUDr. Jan Šenkyřík2,3, MUDr. Anna Seehofnerová2,3, MUDr. Ondřej Horák2,4, MUDr. Petr Jabandžiev, Ph.D.1,2,5
1 Pediatrická klinika, FN Brno
2 Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
3 Klinika dětské radiologie, FN Brno
4 Klinika dětské neurologie, FN Brno
5 CEITEC, Středoevropský technologický institut, Brno

Child abuse and neglect syndrome is a serious social problem which greatly affects health and long-term development of an individual. The physical form of child abuse and neglect syndrome with the highest mortality is the so-called shaken baby syndrome (SBS). It is a form of inflicted head trauma in small children caused by violent shaking, blunt impact or by combination of both of these mechanisms. Nonspecific symptoms often in combination with incomplete or vague history and social controversy are causes of insufficient evidence of the cases. Reported incidence is very likely underestimated and we can speak of the tip of the iceberg of all the cases of shaken baby syndrome. In this publication we present a case of a 4-month-old infant, in which we were able to detect series of injuries typical for SBS using the combination of various diagnostic methods. In the discussion the authors analyse differential diagnosis and diagnostic process in detail in suspicion of SBS.

Keywords: shaken baby syndrome, child abuse and neglect syndrome, vomiting, subdural hygroma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhage.

Published: June 2, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nedorost E, Pecl J, Pinkasová T, Šenkyřík J, Seehofnerová A, Horák O, Jabandžiev P. Shaken baby syndrome. Pediatr. praxi. 2020;21(2):107-112. doi: 10.36290/ped.2020.021.
Download citation

References

  1. Nuño M, Pelissier L, Varshneya K, et al. Outcomes and factors associated with infant abusive head trauma in the US. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015; 16(5): 515-522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Duhaime ACH, Christian CW, Rorke LB, et al. Nonaccidental Head Injury in Infants - The "Shaken-Baby Syndrome". N Engl J Med. 1998; 338(25): 1822-1829. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. David TJ. Shaken baby (shaken impact) syndrome: non-accidental head injury in infancy. J R Soc Med. 1999; 92(11): 556-561. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Choudhary AK, Servaes S, Slovis TL, et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatr Radiol. 2018; 48(8): 1048-1065. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Havránek P, Homolková H, Tomek P. Syndrom třeseného dítěte a jeho chirurgické aspekty. Pediatr. praxi. 2012; 13(2): 76-78.
  6. Christian CW, Block R. Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(5): 1409-1411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Duhaime ACH, Christian CW. Abusive head trauma: evidence, obfuscation, and informed management. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019; 24(5): 481-488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, et al. Analysis of Missed Cases of Abusive Head Trauma. JAMA. 1999; 281(7): 621-626. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Joyce T, Huecker MR. Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma (Shaken Baby Syndrome). In: StatPearls [online]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2019. [cit. 25-11-2019]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499836/
  10. Mian M, Shah J, Dalpiaz A, et al. Shaken Baby Syndrome: A Review. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2015; 34(3): 169-175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Fedor M, Ďurdík P, Buchanec J. Syndróm trasenia dieťaťom. Pediatr. praxi 2005; (4): 197-200.
  12. Laurent-Vannier A, Nathanson M, Quiriau F, et al. A public hearing "Shaken baby syndrome: Guidelines on establishing a robust diagnosis and the procedures to be adopted by healthcare and social services staff". Guidelines issued by the Hearing Commission. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011; 54(9-10): 600-625. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Elkhunovich M, Sirody J, McCormick T, et al. The Utility of Cranial Ultrasound for Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Infants. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018; 34(2): 96-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Cruickshank AM. ACP Best Practice No 166: CSF spectrophotometry in the diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Clin Pathol. 2001; 54(11): 827-830. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Watson ID. What is the Role of CSF Spectrophotometry in the Diagnosis of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage? Ann Clin Biochem. 1998; 35(5): 684-685. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Brož P, Ženková J, Řezáčová K. Vyšetření mozkomíšního moku v diagnostice subarachnoidálního krvácení. Klin. Biochem. Metab. 2013; 21(42): 220-225.
  17. McCabe CF, Donahue SP. Prognostic Indicators for Vision and Mortality in Shaken Baby Syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118(3): 373-377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Antonietti J, Resseguier N, Dubus JC, et al. The medical and social outcome in 2016 of infants who were victims of shaken baby syndrome between 2005 and 2013. Arch Pediatr. 2019; 26(1): 21-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Pediatrics for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.