Pediatr. praxi. 2025;26(6):364-368 | DOI: 10.36290/ped.2025.070

Urological problems in adolescent boys in the general pediatrician's office

MUDr. Marcel Drlík, FEAPU
Urologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, TH klinika, s. r. o., Praha

The most common urological complaints that bring adolescent boys to their general pediatrician are a newly detected scrotal mass, scrotal pain, and a non-retractable foreskin. In contrast to younger school-aged children, lower urinary tract dysfunctions - mani­festing as daytime or nighttime urinary incontinence, urgency, or recurrent urinary tract infections are rare at this age. Recurrent urinary tract infections predominantly affect girls, while they are much less common in boys. Pediatricians also care for boys with chronic urological conditions who are simultaneously followed by a urologist responsible for their specialized management. The aim of this review article is to summarize current knowledge and practical recommendations regarding the diagnosis and indications for treatment of the most common urological problems in adolescent boys. The transition care of the complex and heterogeneous group of adolescents with congenital urological anomalies is beyond the scope of this paper.

Keywords: phimosis, varicocele, spermatic cord torsion, adolescent.

Accepted: December 10, 2025; Published: December 15, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Drlík M. Urological problems in adolescent boys in the general pediatrician's office. Pediatr. praxi. 2025;26(6):364-368. doi: 10.36290/ped.2025.070.
Download citation

References

  1. Drlík M, Kočvara R. Varikokéla. Urol. praxi. 2019;20(2):66-69. Go to original source...
  2. Radmayr C, Bogaert G, Bujons A, et al. EAU Guidelines on Paediatric urology. EAU 2024:1-212.
  3. Drlík M, Faltusová E, Vaĺová Z, et al. Laparoscopic lymphatic and artery sparing microsurgical varicocelectomy - technique, results and long-term outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(2):114.e1-114.e6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Matcovici M, Tareen F, O'Connor BR, et al. Adolescent de novo hydroceles - should they be dealt with by inguinal or scrotal approach? J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(11):2228-2230. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kočvara R, Drlík M, et al. Dětská urologie, Praha: Maxdorf. 2023.
  6. Ching CB, Hays SR, Kaffenberger SD, et al. Pediatric chronic orchialgia: patient population and patterns of care. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(5):799-803. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Imamura E. Phimosis of infants and young children in Japan. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997;39(4):403-405. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child. 1968;43(228):200-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Babu R, Harrison SK, Hutton KA. Ballooning of the foreskin and physiological phimosis: is there any objective evidence of obstructed voiding? BJU Int. 2004;94(3): 384-387. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Celis S, Reed F, Murphy F, et al. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and adolescents: a literature review and clinical series. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(1):34-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Pediatrics for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.