Pediatr. praxi. 2013;14(5):326-328

Some findings from the research of procedural pain in neonates

Mgr.Jaroslava Fendrychová, Ph.D.
Katedra ARIPP, Národní centrum ošetřovatelství a nelékařských zdravotnických oborů, Brno

This article presents some findings from studies of procedural pain in neonates, which took place in the Czech Republic and abroad, and

without statistical methods assesses the frequency of the selected painful procedures carried out in the first days of life of the child. The

result is the finding that neither abroad nor in the Czech Republic the neonatal pain is not evaluated enough, although many improved

over the years. Nurses in many departments use non-pharmacological pain management techniques and rating scales at least.

Keywords: pain, assessment, newborn, research

Published: October 24, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fendrychová J. Some findings from the research of procedural pain in neonates. Pediatr. praxi. 2013;14(5):326-328.
Download citation

References

  1. Stevens B, McGrath P, Gibbins S, et al. Determining behavioural and physiological responses to pain in infants at risk for neurological impairment. Pain, 2007; 127(1-2): 94-102. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Simons SH, van Dijk M, Anand KS, et al. Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 2003; 157: 1058-1064. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in Intensive Care Units. JAMA, 2008; 300(2): 60-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Mydlilová A. Kojení donošených novorozenců. Doporučené postupy v neonatologii. Revidováno 1. 2. 2011. [Online.] [Citováno 2013-07-21.] Dostupné na http://www.neonatology.cz/doporuceni-a-postupy.
  5. Kattwinkel J. Neonatal resuscitation guidelines for ILCOR and NRP: evaluating the evidence and developing a consensus. Journal of Perinatology 2008; 28: 27-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Věstník MZ ČR. Metodický pokyn k zajištění celoplošného novorozeneckého laboratorního screeningu a následné péče. 2009, částka 6, s. 7-14.
  7. WHO Guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy. Geneva: Document Production Services, 2010: 109 ISBN 978-92-4-159922-1.
  8. Fendrychová J, Ferdusová M, Janíčková B, Tisovská L. Odběr kapilární krve na novorozenecký screening. Pediatrie pro praxi 2013; 14(1): 398-340. ISSN 1213-0494.
  9. Larsson BM, Tannfeldt G, Lagercrantz H. Venepuncture is more effective and less painful than heel lancing for blood tests in neonates. Pediatrics 1998; 101(5): 882-886. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Shah V, Ohlsson A. Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates. Cochrane database syst. review, 2001(2): CD001452. Go to original source...
  11. Jain A, Rutter N, Ratnayaka M. Topical amethocaine gel for pain relief of heel prick blood sampling: a randomised double blind controlled trial. Arch dis child fetal neonatal ed. 2001; 84(1): F56-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Anand K, Phil D, Hickey PR. Pain and its efects in the human neonate and fetus. The New England Journal of Medicine 1987; 317(21): 1321-1329. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Anand K. Clinical importance of pain and stress in preterm infants. Biology of the neonate, 1998; 73: 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Craig K, Whitfield M, Grunau R, et al. Pain in the preterm neonate: Behavioral and physiological indices. Pain, 1993; 52: 287-299. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Stevens B, Johnston C. Physiological responses of premature infants to a painful stimulus. Nursing Research, 1994; 43: 226-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Grunau R, Whitfield M, Petrie J, Fryer E. Early pain experience, child end family factors, as precursors of somatization: A prospective study of extremely premature and fullterm children. Pain, 1994; 54: 353-359. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Pediatrics for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.