Pediatr. praxi. 2020;21(2):79-84 | DOI: 10.36290/ped.2020.015

The role of imaging methods in suspected non‑accidental injury

MUDr. Eliška Popelová1, MUDr. Martin Kynčl1, Ph.D., MUDr. Marcela Dvořáková1, prof. MUDr. Miloslav Roček1, CSc., prof. MUDr. Erika Rubešová2
1 Klinika zobrazovacích metod 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha
2 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Several hundred children are physically abused annualy in the Czech Republic. Young age is the most important risk factor. Physical abuse can manifest in numerous ways. Some findings have high specificity for abuse, especially when present in infants. The radiology findings with high specificity for abuse include classic metaphyseal lesions, rib fractures and duodenal trauma. Investigating abused children is difficult because the history tends to be unreliable, children present to hospital after a significant time delay, and the children cannot provide a history themselves due to young age. Moreover, the children often show no visible signs of trauma even in cases of severe intracranial or intraabdominal injuries. Imaging methods are helpful in recognizing skeletal, intracranial, and intraabdominal injuries, assist in their dating and differential diagnosis. In order to yield maximum results from imaging methods, it is necessary to follow recommendations based on up-to date evidence-based medicine.

Keywords: child abuse, trauma, radiology, standardization.

Published: June 2, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Popelová E, Kynčl M, Dvořáková M, Roček M, Rubešová E. The role of imaging methods in suspected non‑accidental injury. Pediatr. praxi. 2020;21(2):79-84. doi: 10.36290/ped.2020.015.
Download citation

References

  1. World Health Organization. World report on violence and health [Internet]. 2002. Dostupné na: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42495/9241545615_eng.pdf?sequence=1 & isAllowed=y
  2. Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí. Roční výkaz o výkonu sociálně právní ochrany dětí za rok 2018 [Internet]. Dostupné na: https://www.mpsv.cz/statistiky-1
  3. Adamsbaum C, Morel B, Ducot B, Antoni G, Rey‑Salmon C. Dating the abusive head trauma episode and perpetrator statements : key points for imaging. Pediatr R. 2014; 44: 578-588. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. The Royal College of Radiologists, The Society and College of Radiographers. The radiological investigation of suspected physical abuse in children- Revised irst Edition [Internet]. www.rcr.ac.uk. 2018. Dostupné na: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/radiological‑investigation‑suspected‑physical‑abuse‑children
  5. Lindberg DM, Harper NS, Laskey AL, Berger RP. Prevalence of abusive fractures of the hands, feet, spine, or pelvis on skeletal survey: Perhaps "uncommon" is more common than suggested. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013; 29(1): 26-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kleinman PK. Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse. 3rd editio. Cambridge University Press; 2015. 750 p. Go to original source...
  7. Merten F, Radkowski A, Leonidas C, Univer D. The Abused Child: A Radiological Reappraisal. Radiology. 1983; 146: 377-381. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Grayev AM, Boal DKB, Wallach DM, Segal LS. Metaphyseal fractures mimicking abuse during treatment for clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol. 2001; 31(8): 559-563. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. O'Connell AM, Donoghue VB. Can classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section? Pediatr Radiol. 2007; 37(5): 488-491. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Barber I, Perez‑Rossello JM, Wilson CR, Kleinman PK. The yield of high‑detail radiographic skeletal surveys in suspected infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol. 2014; 45(1): 69-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Merten DF, Carpenter BLM. Radiologic imaging of inflicted injury in the child abuse syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am [Internet]. 1990; 37(4): 815-37. Dostupné na: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(16)36938-3 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Bilo RAC, Robben SGF, van Rijn RR. Forensic Aspects of Paediatric Fractures. Springer‑Vergal Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. 205 p. Go to original source...
  13. Erfurt C, Hahn G, Roesner D, Schmidt U. Pediatric radiological diagnostic procedures in cases of suspected child abuse. Forensic Sci Med Pathol [Internet]. 2011 Mar [cited 2014 Mar 16];7(1): 65-74. Dostupné na: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20195804 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Loder RT, Bookout C. Fracture patterns in battered children. J Orthop Trauma. 1991; 5(4): 428-433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Marine MB, Corea D, Steenburg SD, Wanner M, Eckert GJ, Jennings SG, et al. Is the new ACR‑SPR practice guideline for addition of oblique views of the ribs to the skeletal survey for child abuse justified? Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(4): 868-871. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Duffy SO, Squires J, Fromkin JB, Berger RP. Use of skeletal surveys to evaluate for physical abuse: analysis of 703 consecutive skeletal surveys. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2011 Jan [cited 2014 Mar 16]; 127(1): e47-52. Dostupné na: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21149429 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Singh R, Phil B, Squires J, Fromkin JB, Berger RP. Assessing the use of follow‑up skeletal surveys in children with suspected physical abuse. 2012; 73(4).
  18. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria Suspected Physical Abuse-Child [Internet]. 2016. Dostupné na: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69443/Narrative/
  19. Sieswerda‑Hoogendoorn T, Boos S, Spivack B, Bilo RAC, van Rijn RR. Abusive Head Trauma Part I. Clinical aspects. Eur J Pediatr. 2012; 171: 415-423. Go to original source...
  20. Kemp a M, Jaspan T, Griffiths J, Stoodley N, Mann MK, Tempest V, et al. Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non‑abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2014 Mar 9]; 96(12): 1103-1112. Dostupné na: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21965812
  21. Fanconi M, Lips U. Shaken baby syndrome in Switzerland: results of a prospective follow‑up study, 2002-2007. 2010; 2002-2007.
  22. Matschke AJ, Voss J, Görndt J. Nonaccidental Head Injury Is the Most Common Cause of Subdural Bleeding in Infants < 1 Year of Age. Pediatrics. 2015; 124(6): 1587-1594. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Rubin DM, Christian CW, Bilaniuk LT, Zazyczny KA, Durbin Dr. Occult Head Injury in High‑Risk Abused Children. 2018; D(6).
  24. Adamsbaum C, Rambaud C. Abusive head trauma: don't overlook bridging vein thrombosis. Pediatr Radiol [Internet]. 2012 Nov [cited 2014 Mar 16]; 42(11): 1298-1300. Dostupné na: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22885602 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Kemp AM, Rajaram S, Mann M, Tempest V, Farewell D. What neuroimaging should be performed in children in whom inflicted brain injury (iBI) is suspected? A systematic review. Clin Radiol [Internet]. 2009; 64(5): 473-483. Dostupné na: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2008. 11. 011 Go to original source...
  26. Lonergan GJ, Baker AM, Morey MK, Boos SS. From the Archives of the AFIP Child Abuse: Radiologic‑Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2003; 23: 811-845. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Wood J, Rubin DM, Nance ML, Christian CW. Distinguishing inflicted versus accidental abdominal injuries in young children. J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care. 2005; 59(5): 1203-1208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Maguire SA, Upadhyaya M, Evans A, Mann MK, Haroon MM, Tempest V, et al. A systematic review of abusive visceral injuries in childhood--their range and recognition. Child Abuse Negl [Internet]. 2013 Jul [cited 2014 Mar 16]; 37(7): 430-45. Dostupné na: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213412002542 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. § 368 odst. 1, trestní zákoník, č. 40/2009 Sb. Go to original source...
  30. § 198 trestní zákoník, č. 40/2009 Sb. Go to original source...
  31. § 367 odst. 1, trestní zákoník, č. 40/2009 Sb.
  32. § 10 odst. 4 ve spojení s § 6 písm. e) zákona č. 359/1999 Sb., o sociálně‑právní ochraně dětí, v platném znění
  33. § 345 trestní zákoník, č. 40/2009 Sb. Go to original source...




Pediatrics for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.